“Interpreter of Maladies” (Lahiri) Discussion Questions
1 Discuss the difficulty of meaningful communication
as a thematic concept in “Interpreter of Maladies,” specifically the
interpretations and misinterpretations that occur during the course of the
story. Consider the role that cultural
differences, immigration and assimilation, and the dynamics of relationships
play in hindering communication.
2 Even at middle age, Mr. Kapasi does not have a
clear identity. Discuss the conflicts
within his life, both internal and external, that contribute to his shifting
and uncertain sense of who he is and where he belongs.
3 What is the tone of the story? Consider how Lahiri’s use of detail, dialogue
and visual images help develop tone.
4 How does Lahiri use Mr. Kapasi’s dreams and
imaginings to develop his character?
5 Identify examples of dramatic irony within the
short story and address how they contribute to/affect Lahiri’s tone.
In Interpreter of Maladies by Jhumpa Lahiri, Mr. Kapasi's identity is not clear due to internal conflicts of never amounting to what he once dreamed of becoming: "an interpreter for diplomats and dignitaries," (Lahiri 18). Possessing this internal conflict is what caused his external conflict of misinterpreting a romantic interest.
ReplyDeleteThe fact that his first occupational dream never came true caused him to be hopeful for a second chance in his love life. Seeing this opportunity made him reevaluate his current situation of accepting less than he deserves. Mr. Kapasi began seeing what he wanted to see; "She did not behave in a romantic way toward her husband, and yet she had used the word to describe him," (Lahiri 19). Mr. Kapasi began seeing her use of a certain word to imply something much larger. Because of this overthinking, he pushes his personal identity farther away, questioning who he wants to be and what life he wants to live.
I like the evidence you used to support this idea of his failure in his career resulting in him to be overly hopeful in his love life. I have noticed that a lot of people tend to rationalize something in their lives not being great by telling themselves another part of their life will make up for it. Maybe Mr. Kapasi assumed his romantic life could not be horrible if his career life was. It is also interesting to tie in communication and how that may be skewed due to internal and external struggles on the individual. It could be said that if Mr. Kapasi was able to choose his own life and was happy in his marriage that he only would have interpreted her use of 'romantic' as a rather inaccurate use of the word. A lot of what people say is less about the words coming out of their mouths and more about how the receiving end interprets those words based on their own situations and experiences. This is probably why conversations with text are so hard to figure out, may it be letters or text messages.
DeleteI really enjoyed your analysis of what fueled Mr. Kapasi’s longing for something less than what he deserves. This is so important in evaluating why he became infatuated with Mrs. Das in the first place; before he had seen her true colors, he had let himself fall for her. Perhaps this is why his reaction to Mrs. Das’s affair was so exaggerated and dramatic. Interpreting his internal conflict is so vital because it indirectly characterizes him as someone who seeks and desires affection without real substance. It’s possible that the reason he was so fascinated with the idea of Mrs. Das was because of her lack of affection towards her husband and children and increased interest in Mr. Kapasi. And Claire, I like your relation to this story to real life; people rationalizing something even though it is beneath their median of what they actually deserve. In this sense, I pity Mr. Kapasi. In life, especially in the society that we live in today, it is so important to dig deep beneath the surface of not only people that we meet, but events that happen to us. Once Mr. Kapasi saw the true character of Mrs. Das, he experienced a parallel reaction; us as readers saw him expand and realize that there is so much more to what he deserves than a truly conceded, shallow, and honestly, evil woman. Towards the end of this short story, we see Mr. Kapasi become more round and develop into the character that the author intended for him to be. I appreciated both of your comments!
DeleteI agree with your assertion that his internal identity conflict contributed to the external miscommunication he had. I think your assertion could have been even further supported through the use of specific quotation that took place in the text. Mr. Kapasi definitely pushed his external desires to reflect his internal conflict. He clearly had unfulfilled dreams the he wishhed to accomplish. His feelings developed when he began to decide to never "settle for less" than what he thought he deserved. I also agree with Zoe's statement that Mr. Kapasi seemed to seek affection without real substance. After realizing that Mrs. Das was truly a shallow person, the interest dissolved. Society often tries to believe the best in people or root for the "underdog" even if the potential isn't really there. It's the humanistic nature of people. This specific aspect of the short story highlights this idea and reveals a thematic meaning.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteIn Jhumpa Lahiri's short story, Interpreter of Maladies, she addresses the uncertain identity of the middle-aged Mr. Kapasi by using characterization and conflict. Throughout the beginning of the story Mr. Kapasi observes the tourist family and compares their mannerisms with that of his own family. When Mr. Das asked him about the monotony of his job, Mr. Kapasi expressed his enjoyment of it and mentioned that he also worked as an interpreter at a doctors office. While the Das family was able to look at the job as a great service to the community, Mr. Kapasi looked on it with shame. He spent his youth dreaming and studying to be a great interpreter, solving the disputes between lands and making a difference. Once his marriage was arranged, everything he worked for went to waste. He was forced into a job he did not want and a marriage with a woman he did not love. This caused him to become unsure of himself and his future because what he identified and valued with most, his vast knowledge of languages, was all but stripped away from him. He soon lost many of the languages he spent so much time learning, Lahiri even noted that, "sometimes he feared that his children knew better English than he did." (Lahiri 18) While he settled into the identity of being a father, a husband, and a bread winner, he had to suffer the loss of his son. He went into interpreting for the doctor to pay the bills and soon became eternally caught up in the job. His wife emotionally separated herself from him to deal with the loss and his son was dead and gone; this identity he was forced into was crumbled around him. Dealing with his own failure internally and having great tragedies change his path in life led him to become someone he did not even recognize. This is why Mrs. Das captured his heart so easily when she recognized how 'romantic' his interpreting job was. She made him feel like a little piece of himself was back again. That, of course, was soon lost. With all these circumstances it is no wonder why Mr. Kapasi was having a constant identity crisis.
ReplyDeleteI thoroughly appreciated the level of detail in your analysis. The evidence you used to support the idea that Mr. Kapasi was just pulled though life was fascinating. Throughout my reading, I constantly stopped to think whether or not Mr. Kapasi would get his life back on track, but now I understand that Mr. Kapasi’s life was meant to be a downward spiral. I completely agree with you on the fact that Mr. Kapasi was unfitting for his life. Lahiri wanted to show that Kapasi went from a “devoted scholar,” (Lahiri 18), to a driver that interprets others’ problems. There is no need for Mr. Kapasi to deal with others’ problems when he cannot deal with his own. I like the way you used chronological events to signify how the past affected the present. Mr. Kapasi did have a better life, but then unfortunate events, such as the death of his son, and other insecurities led him to be the man Lahiri portrays. Lahiri demonstrated the use of her strong characterization skills, and you caught them without much trouble.
DeleteI agree with Kartik in a sense that Mr. Kapasi's life was meant to be a downward spiral. This sparks my point that life is not always a path clear cut path of flowers and rainbows. In this case, Mr. Kapasi has almost given up in changing direction of his life due to his constant failure. This reminds me of the short clip we watched in class on Red's Dream by Pixar. Once again, the individual's dreams were cut short by reality. This constant theme is interesting to explore, because in all of these different contexts, dreams are never quite achieved as you would expect them to be. Given, this highlights the sense of situational irony in the entirety of the short story.
DeleteI find your incorporation of the observation that he compares the Das family's mannerisms with that of his own family. This observation is an obvious characterization that connects Mrs. Das and Mr. Kapasi. I also agree with Taylor and Kartik in that you illustrated Mr. Kapasi's life as a downward spiral; that is also how I perceived the series of events. However, I do not agree that his identity was lost because of the death of his child. I believe that he struggled with his identity even before the tragedy of his son's death because he did not succeed in becoming an interpreter for diplomats and dignitaries.
DeleteI really like how well thought out your analysis is. It provides thorough details along with explanations that greatly help the reader understand Mr. Kapasi on a higher level. I also agree that Mr. Kapasi's life was seen as a downward spiral; however, I also agree with Alyssa in that his identity was not lost because of the death of his child. I believe his life was lost when his parents arranged his marriage because that was the first event in his life that he did not have complete control over.
DeleteI like the analysis and the deeper meaning you were able to discover by reading this short story. You definitely make it easier for someone to understand Mr. Kapasi at a higher level and emphasis the "downward spiral" that he is encountering by Mrs. Das. Despite all this detailed analysis to perfection, I did, however, find it odd that you dragged to the conclusion of the son's death of being his loss of identity. I rather think that he lost his identity when he had to come to reality and not be able to have his dream occupation of becoming an interpreter. I agree that he was distracted with Mrs. Das distracting his mindset with the word 'romantic' but I do believe that due to his "thankless occupation," (Lahiri 18) of a doctor's assistant, that makes it hard to identify himself as a person because he is performing an occupation that he does not recognize himself to be. Overall, I believe that your statement is one hundred percent arguable in the sense of Mr. Kapasi losing his 'identity' by his son due to the fact of your strong argument points that you included in your analysis.
DeleteIn Jhumpa Lahiri’s short story, “Interpreter of Maladies,” the undeniable presence of dramatic irony looms over all of the characters, displaying a foreshadowing tone that keeps the reader on their toes. Perhaps the most evident display of dramatic irony in this short story is Mr. Kapasi’s infatuation with the mere physical form of Mrs. Das. Throughout the short story, it appears that Mr. Kapasi overlooks the obvious signs of scorn that engulfs Mrs. Das. The audience, of course, easily recognizes Mrs. Das’s real character; Mr. Kapasi is blinded by his infatuation. “Her sudden interest in him, an interest she did not express in either her husband or her children, was mildly intoxicating. When Mr. Kapasi thought once again about how she had said "romantic," the feeling of intoxication grew.” (19) In this quote, Lahiri exemplifies how he is not only infatuated with the physical appearance of Mrs. Das, but the attention that he has not received in his personal life. This evident dramatic irony contributes to an overall tone of shallowness in the story. Through the thoughts of Mr. Kapasi, the author depicts and illustrates this tone. Point of view is a crucial part of this short story, and the author shows the correlation between dramatic irony and tone.
ReplyDeleteAnother example of dramatic irony is how Mr. Kapasi’s occupation is an interpreter, and the title of the short story is “Interpreter of Maladies,” yet a very important theme in this short story is the misinterpreting of emotions between characters and personalities of the round characters. “For the first time, her eyes met Mr. Kapasi’s in the rearview mirror: pale, a bit small, their gaze fixed but drowsy…” (17) In this quote, it shows how Mr. Kapasi largely misinterprets Mrs. Das’s feelings for him. He believes that Mrs. Das is truly interested in the art of his occupation, when in reality Mrs. Das was just interested in Mr. Kapasi interpreting the malady that is a failed and bitter marriage and an overall unhappy life. This quote shows how dramatic irony takes place throughout the story and through two of the most dynamic characters. The feeling of misinterpretation fuels the story’s tone of misunderstanding. It contributes to the tone because it interprets the point of view into the tone the author is attempting to set.
I liked your reference from a smaller, more individual scale of Mr. Kalapsi's lack of attention in his personal life to a larger scale, how it causes him to fall for Mrs. Das so easily. Additionally, I liked the point you mentioned of how Mrs. Das almost tricks Mr. Kalapsi into believing she is interested in him romantically, when in reality she simply wants an interpretation to her lifelong family issues. This is interesting because it gives the reader a different perspective on the woman with "large dark brown sunglasses" and "a big straw bag, almost as big as her torso," (Lahiri 14). This adds to the negative characterization of Mrs. Das, reinforcing her uncaring nature of never taking others' feelings into account. Perhaps later on, she will begin to regret this too, charming an innocent bystander into helping her with her own personal problems.
DeleteI agree with Taylor's point that marked the importance of your analysis of Mr Kapasi's lack of attention of his personal life on an individual scale. it shows how he makes little attempt to adjust/improve his relationship with his life but rather, thinks about The Dao's relationship and the similarities between theirs and his. I also liked your point of how misinterpretation fuels the story’s tone of misunderstanding. It provides well thought out details along with explanations that greatly help the reader understand Mr. Kapasi on a higher level. This understatement showed me that the use of dramatic irony allows for the plot to develop by how it shows the different point of views of the important characters of the short story. Prehaps Mr. Kapsi will look back on his time with the Dao family and use his understatement of Both Mr. Dao and Mrs. Ado to help revitalize his life and improve his marriage.
DeleteI liked the way in which you referenced Mr. Kapasi's fixation on the physical appearance of Mrs. Das. I had noticed this as well while reading. I think the use of the word "infuriating" to describe his feelings about his personal life is a great choice. However, I wasn't as sure that it described his feelings for her appearance as well. He seems to admire her appearance and becomes infuriated that he does not get to see the same thing in his wife.
DeleteI found your interpretation (see what I did there) of the title to be very insightful. They way you described it as ironic as a result of the way emotions are misinterpreted was very thought provoking. Given this new idea, I found it interesting that Mrs. Das posed the idea that Mr. Kapasi could easily misinterpret illnesses in his line of work. Since he is the one that misinterprets Mrs. Das's feelings, that idea becomes ironic by itself.
In Jhumpa Lahiri’s text, The Interpreter of Maladies, Lahiri consistently projects a tone of insecurity and solitude throughout. During Mr. Kapasi’s refection into the past, he “feared that his children knew better,” (Lahiri 18). This displays the reason for which Mr. Kapasi strives to learn English to the very limit. Yet, even with his experience and age, he still fears for the slightest inconveniences. One example of solitude is Mr. Das and his magazines. Lahiri accurately portrays the intent to which the guidebooks encompass the world of Mr. Das. Mr. Das, being “absorbed by his tour book,” (Lahiri 19) adds to the tone of solitude that Lahiri is displaying time and time again. The dialogue that is present throughout the story, allows Lahiri to build upon her tone of insecurity. Mr. Kapasi is taken off guard by the fact that Mrs. Das wants his address. Mr. Kapasi’s restatement of the question, “You would like my address?” (Lahiri 20) enhances Lahiri’s descriptiveness of the loneliness Mr. Kapasi is facing. Mr. Kapasi lives a life of solitude, and for one to ask him a question of that manner causes him not to respond.
ReplyDeleteOne instance where Lahiri evokes insecurity is when Mr. Kapasi is explaining his past job. As he was explaining, Mrs. Das states “So these patients are totally dependent on you,” (Lahiri 18). Just following that remark, Mr. Kapasi hesitates to answer. He does not want to seem too overconfident because he knows that he is not perfect. Lahiri represents the fact that those who do not realize themselves are insecure. In continuation, Lahiri’s use of visual images contribute to the tone of isolation. While the Das family is eating lunch, Kapasi is sitting there alone “in peace,” (Lahiri 20), but “reluctantly headed towards another table,” (Lahiri 20). Lahiri captures Mr. Kapasi’s introvert nature by describing the scene around him as well as his thoughts. The astute use of the table made it seen as if Mr. Kapasi was miles away. Lahiri’s implementation of diction added to her development of her tone. Lastly, insecurity is shown when Mrs. Das gives up on herself. When Mr. Kapasi challenged the idea of Mrs. Das, she “opened her mouth…certain knowledge passed her eyes,” (Lahiri 28). This was where Lahiri developed her tone into a theme. Mrs. Das was isolated and insecure throughout the short story, and when she finally realized that, through Mr. Kapasi, she knew she was wrong. Mrs. Das then exits the car in solitude. Lahiri demonstrates the solemn tone of insecurity and solitude through her magnificent use of detail, dialogue, and images.
I agreed with you that the tone conveyed throughout the short story was insecurity in my blog post; however, we both emphasized two different points that created this tone of insecurity or diffidence. It was different from mine because you emphasized Kapasi's innate "introvert nature" yet I used the way he viewed the foreigners as the the source of his diffidence. However, I can see why your point conveys that same sense of diffidence because it emphasizes his shyness and unclear identity. Also, her tone of solitude is also now apparent with the clarification you provide by how he tries to stay away from the Das family when seeing them at a lunch table.
DeleteThe short story “Interpreter of Maladies” by Jhumpa Lahiri emphasizes how meaningful communication can make or break a relationship. Throughout the short story we constantly see how lack of communication has broken apart the Das family, and how good communication, and possibly misinterpretation, brought Mrs. Das and Mr. Kapasi closer. Although language and culture are not barriers between Mr. and Mrs. Das, they seem to have the most communication difficulties. On the other hand, the barriers between Mrs. Das and Mr. Kapasi do not keep them from having meaningful conversation.
ReplyDeleteThe problems in communication between Mr. and Mrs. Das are apparent even in the beginning. For example the first sentence says, “… Mr. and Mrs. Das bickered …”, showing how they do not communicate well. But the lack of good communication also extends to the children, which makes the family even more detached. Although Lahiri focuses more on Mrs. Das’ detachment from her family, she also mentions how Mr. Das is always preoccupied with either his camera or a travel guide. Between the Das’, language and cultural differences are not a problem, and do not justify their impartiality towards each other. The utter disregard for each other can be seen when Bobby was getting attacked by the monkeys. Instead of rushing to help their son like good parents, the Das’ just stood back and let Mr. Kapasi rescue their son. The lack of communication is apparent since neither parent asks Bobby if he is alright, but rather just continue as if nothing significant has happened. This neglect for Bobby might also be due to the fact that he is a bastard, not in a derogatory sense but as it is in the dictionary.
On the other hand, the communication between Mrs. Das and Mr. Kapasi brings two strangers closer and makes them appreciate each other. Mrs. Das, who has been detached for most of the trip, seems to have an unusual interest in Mr. Kapasi’s job. She says, “’Tell us more about your job, Mr. Kapasi’”, which insinuates that she is interested in him. This interest is much more apparent as the conversation develops since Mrs. Das seems to want to keep the conversation alive. This shows how good communication, even between strangers, can bring two people closer. The conversation between Mrs. Das and Mr. Kapasi could have been misinterpreted as just friendly conversation, and therefore did not prompt a response from Mr. Das. The author also shows how a simple conversation can overcome barriers, such as the cultural and language barriers between Mrs. Das and Mr. Kapasi.
I appreciated how you highlighted the Das' family dynamic, particularly when you mentioned how neither Mr. nor Mrs. Das attempted to help Bobby out when he was being attacked by the monkeys. This further showed how the Dases appear to be uncaring parents. Neither of them were willing to risk the chance of personal injury to save Bobby. Instead they ordered Mr. Kapasi to help him. This shows how uncaring both of them are as parents. They call on others to discipline their children. Sometimes this is even the children themselves, such as when Mr. Das told Bobby to stop Ronny from messing with the goat. He was described as "to have no intention of intervening" (Lahiri, 13). It shows just how young and immature Mr. and Mrs. Das are which is a contributing factor to their dysfunctional relationship.
DeleteI enjoyed how you touched upon Mr. and Mrs. Das' relationship and how it is void of any turn care or love in general. Personally, I believe that this stems from Mrs. Das knowing about the truth behind Bobby and his real father. Due to Mrs. Das having to lock this knowledge away from her own husband (who should know her better than anyone else), she has become somewhat distant and cold towards Mr. Das and, to an extent, Bobby himself. This is perfectly illustrated when Bobby is surrounded by the monkeys near the end of the passage. Mrs. Das does not make any attempt to help her son or even encourage her husband to help him. Instead, she chooses to ask for the aid of Mr. Kapasi, who she was known for only a short amount of time. Small actions such as these help express what kind of family dynamic the Dases have.
DeleteThe Interpreter of Maladies, a short story written by Jhumpa Lahiri, illuminates the life of a man by the name of Mr. Kapasi. Mr. Kapasi works as a tour guide and also as an interpreter for a doctor facing a language barrier in his local practice. However, the doctor is not the only character facing a barrier on his life; Mr Kapasi faces his own barrier of determining his identity in the life he never thought he would live, " The job was a sign of his failings... he had dreamed of-resolving conflicts between people
ReplyDeleteand nations". This external conflict shifts Mr. Kapasi's perspective of himself into a negative light. By not being what he had always dreamed of being, he views not only his career, but himself as a human to be a failure. At least Mr. Kapasi has a loving family with a caring wife to return home to each night to fuel up on his motivation... or does he? Mr. Kapasi has had a difficult time distinguishing his relationship between a purely functional one and a happy one, " He had never admired the backs of his wife’s
legs the way he now admired those of Mrs. Das, walking as if for his benefit alone.". He comes to the realization that he does not feel for his wife anymore what he had felt at one point and is no longer oblivious to the signs of a dysfunctional and uncomfortable marriage that are displayed withing his very own. He internally believes now that his wife is not the woman for him, and instead, Mrs. Das should replace her. This conflict, however ordinary in the US, is still to be considered a vital piece of Mr. Kapasi's puzzle that is his identity. His internal struggle with his love life is almost a reflection of his career. However this balances the failures for he may be able to in part put blame on his wife for "not being good enough" so he can justify in his own mind that all of the un-ideal situations in his life are not his fault. This thesis to his qualification may seem other-worldly, but if one were to look at it from their own perspective, they would acknowledge that there is a certain satisfaction in knowing that in times of great distress, at least some of the struggle you are witnessing is not a result of your doing. Mr. Kapasi desperately requires a sense of realism in his life to determine his identity among his family and career lives. His character thrives on the day to day aspect of his life, and that is why he admires Surya, the sun god, representing the rising through the setting sun. He is able to internally connect with Surya for he feels a certain stage, the setting phase of the sun, to be his entire life at this point, and is why he stands in front of Astachala-Surya for the longest amount of time. His internal and external conflicts dealing with the failures and slow digression of the quality of his life leave him confused as to who he has become compared to who he though he would be.
In The Interpreter of Maladies, a short-story by Jhumpa Lahiri, the author portrays a disenchanted tone through setting. Before Mrs. Das tells her secret to Mr. Kapasi, they visit the temple. Here, the setting is bright. “It was dedicated to the great master of life, the sun, which struck three sides of the edifice as it made its journey each day across the sky” (Lahiri, 21). Because it is a sun temple, the setting is illuminated and gives the impression that the sun is beating down on them. This setting helps to show the feelings Mr. Kapasi felt towards Mrs. Das. It is symbolic of his newfound infatuation with her which caused him to feel more exuberant. By contrast, the hills are a darker setting. It was described to have “dozens of monkeys seated on stones, as well as on the branches of trees” (Lahiri, 24). This image of a considerable amount of aggressive animals and thick foliage goes well with Mrs. Das confessing her secret to Mr. Kapasi. It creates a darker image that contrasts with the one at the temple. This helps exemplify Mr. Kapasi’s transition of feelings of infatuation with Mrs. Das to that of distaste. This is exemplified when the slip of paper flies out of Mrs. Das’ bag and Mr. Kapasi, instead of alerting her, chooses to not mention it. He does not have as much of a desire to have a regular correspondence with her as he had initially. This shows that he no longer admires her as he had when she first showed what he perceived as interest in him.
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed the way that you used setting to describe the tone/atmosphere that Mr. Kapasi and Mrs. Das share in every encounter. For example, you wrote that the brightness of day at the temple reflected the blind feelings of affection Mr. Kapasi had for Mrs. Das, and I came to realize that setting was very symbolic in that situation. Personally, unless I am writing my own stories, I do not often pay attention to setting, since I tend to focus more on finding symbols and irony in a story, but I have come to realize that setting is also very important in analyzing any story. The way that the tone changes along with the setting really helps to accentuate the intensity of Mr. Kapasi’s current feelings for Mrs. Das in every situation. At the temple, he is very happy as he talks with Mrs. Das, and at the hills, after realizing of Mrs. Das’ affair with another man, he loses every ounce of affection towards her, letting the slip of paper with his address float away, a physical symbol of his realization that he does not want to associate with her.
DeleteI found it interesting how you incorporated the setting of the story into the overall tone. I noticed throughout the story that there were quite a few examples of contrasts between light and dark, similarly to the temple. Overall, the setting is told up front to be a "dry, bright Saturday" in mid July, so this detail could foreshadow to the importance of the sun and light in general in the tone of the story. In conclusion, what I gathered from the story and your interpretation is that light signifies hope and fantasies, while darkness represents the harsh reality of the situation and a lack of passion that once existed.
DeleteIn Jhumpa Lahiri’s short story “Interpreter of Maladies,” Mr. Kapasi, an interpreter and part time tour guide, is an ambiguous character. His lack of a clear identity is addressed through the conflicts, internal and external, he faces throughout his life and the characterization of himself and Mrs. Das.
ReplyDeleteMr. Kapasi’s goal that he strived for his entire life was to become “an interpreter for dipolmats and dignitaries,” (Lahiri 18). Despite being practically fluent in about nine languages, he settles for being an English interpreter for the local doctor. His wife disregards any praise for his job because she resents him aiding in saving the lives of others when they could not save his own son. Mr. Kapasi is proud of his abilities but not his job because of his wife’s criticism. When Mrs. Das calls Mr. Kapasi’s job a “big responsibility,” (Lahiri 18) his pride in his occupation returns. The differing views relating to his profession result in Mr. Kapasi’s uncertain sense of self.
Mrs. Das romanticizes Mr. Kapasi’s job, calling it “so romantic,” (Lahiri 17) giving him a sense of self-worth and causing him to sentimentalize her in return. This, along with his observations of Mrs. Das seemingly failing marriage, give Mr. Kapasi the impression that he is not alone in his matrimonial struggles. Throughout the text, Mr. Kapasi characterizes Mrs. Das in extreme detail, from her “red and white checkered skirt” to her “frosty pink fingernails paitned to match her lips” (Lahiri 14). The only substantial nonphysical characterization of Mrs. Das relates to her awful and flawed parenting habits. This proves that Mr. Kapasi’s attraction towards Mrs. Das is stricktly physical and unsubstantial. Mr. Kapasi later on characterizes himself as “not even important enough to be properly insulted” (Lahiri 28). Without Mrs. Das romanticizing him and fostering a connection between the two, Mr. Kapasi again finds himself indeterminate of his place in the world and who is really is.
I agree with your analysis that Mrs. Das' compliments helped to boost Mr. Kapasi's self esteem which may be the root of his fantasies of his seemingly ideal woman and affected his "uncertain sense of self." I admire your connection of the failing marriages of both the Das and the Kapasi family playing a pivotal role in Mr. Kapasi's internal struggles of fantasizing about another woman while wanting to stay faithful to his unappreciative wife. I also enjoyed reading your analysis of the external struggles that Mr. Kapasi faced because it correlated with an idea that I had mentioned in my blog post. Mr. Kapasi's fantasies of this somewhat foreign and exotic woman had substantially distorted his perception of Mrs. Das' true personality. However, your conclusion seemed abrupt and the quote you used as a concrete detail lacked the emphasis it needed on both your thesis statement and concluding sentence. The quote seems out of place because it lacks the support of your analysis of the external and internal struggles that resulted in Mr. Kapasi finding himself "indeterminate of his place in the world and who he really is."
DeleteIn Jhumpa Lahiri's "Interpreter of Maladies," the identity of Mr. Kapasi is not clear due to the author's use of characterization and plot. The main external event that occured in his life that causes this is the death of his son. Before this event, his dream was to become a interpreter between diplomats and he took great pride in his knowledge. However, he had to give up his job as a teacher and take a job at the doctors office in order to pay off the medical bills accumulated from his son's disease (Lahiri 18). The act of Mr. Kapasi taking a job at the same doctors office that his son was diagnosed with Typhoid caused marital problems in his life because his wife felt as though it was unfair that he was helping other peoples lives when their own son's life could not be helped. Mr. Kapasi also did not obtain the same knowledge that he once had, which caused him to loose sight of who he truly was. Due to this, Mr. Kapasi not only believes he his a failure but also longs for the affection from his wife that he has not had in awhile. When Mrs. Das shows a sudden interest in him and regards his work as "romantic," he then re-questions his life. He does this by day-dreaming about what it will be like to talk to Mrs. Das through letters and discuss their disappointment in their marriages in secret. He also does this by looking back at how he used to know multiple languages and now he only knows English and is afraid that his kids are more fluent in English than he is (Lahiri 18). He was forced into downgrading himself in order to help his family, and because of this he was unsure of who he was.
ReplyDeleteLauren, you have exposed a perspective of this short story and the story of Mr. Kapasi himself that I had failed to notice. I enjoyed discovering the new opinions you shared for it provides an entirely new reason for his uncertainty in himself. The approach you offered was much more sentimental with the implementation of pathos in regards to the mentioning of the death of Mr. Kapasi's son. However sad, your analysis provided adequate evidence to support the child's death being the catalyst to Mr. Kapasi's confusion. I also appreciate how you introduced the absence of intimacy between Mr. Kapasi and his wife as a factor of his believing that Mrs. Das truly "showed a sudden interest in him". You elaborated on this aspect by analyzing how his futuristic daydreams outlined his longing-or desire if you will- for a companion to share grievances with and to build a bond over. Your conclusion, I found however, lacked a short summary wrapping up all of the amazing thoughts you had put out on paper. I also feel that if you were to elaborate on the importance of Mr. Kapasi being "unsure of who he was" as a factor to those events being so significant to him on an internal level, your argument would have contained a deeper level of complexity.
DeleteIn Interpreter of Maladies, Mr. Kapasi struggles to find himself due to Mrs. Das. He struggles both internally and externally and often goes back and forth between his current relationship with his wife, his growing feelings for Mrs. Das, and the crushing feeling he has after Mrs. Das reveals her secret affair to him.
ReplyDeleteMr. Kapasi struggles in finding evidence of a strong relationship in his marriage. After his first child dies of typhus, his wife resents his work as an interpreter, and she “resented the other lives he helped, in his own small way, to save” (Lahiri 19). Due to the increased interest from Mrs. Das, Mr. Kapasi starts to see the signs of a bad marriage in his life, “the bickering, the indifference, the protracted silences,” and Mrs. Das’ personal interest in his work has him “mildly intoxicated” (Lahiri 19). This feeling fuels Mr. Kapasi to try and spend as much time as he can with her, and so it alters his traditional routines. For example, when the group stopped to eat, in the past, Mr. Kapasi used to eat in peace, content with eating by himself, whereas with Mrs. Das, he hopes to sit next to her and eat with her. Another example is when the tour ends and he is racking his brain trying to find someplace else to go when the day ends, in hopes of spending a couple more hours with Mrs. Das before her family leaves him, instead of his usual routine of returning home, washing, and drinking a cup of tea while reading the newspaper.
Once they arrive at the hills of Udayagiri and Khandagiri, Mrs. Das opts to stay in the van, much to Mr. Kapasi’s pleasure. Mr. Kapasi observes that Bobby is very brave, playing with the monkeys, and Mrs. Das reveals her secret affair to him. Taken by surprise, Mr. Kapasi is left wondering what to do; Mrs. Das’ expectation of him to tell her how to solve her “problem” versus the reality that he does not know how to respond. Through this realization however, Mr. Kapasi realizes that due to his failed marriage, he latched on to whoever gave him the attention that he could not get from his wife, and he realizes that he is caught in a dark place filled with despair and hopelessness. Due to the circumstances that he now faces, Mr. Kapasi falls into a state of identity-crisis.
(Also, this is Taeho.)
In the short story Interpreter of Maladies written by Jhumpa Lahiri, the author conveys a critical and somewhat disapproving tone throughout the story. Just from observing from a surface level, it is quite apparent that Mr. and Mrs. Das' relationship is rocky and not the typically loving marriage you would expect out of an everyday short story. The author wrote the relationship between the two to be distant and not overly heartfelt. That being said, the author also decided to portray Mrs. Das as the main cause of the condition of their marriage. She can be characterized as a, for lack of a better phrase, stuck up and pretentious woman. The author expressed this in the story through her actions such as constantly wearing her fancy sunglasses and complaining about her feet hurting from walking in her expensive high heels. Overall, the tone of the author is conveyed through his commentary and descriptions of Mrs. Das' actions. For example, after Bobby is attacked by the hungry monkeys near the end of the story, Mrs. Das' main concern seems to be to just leave the area due to her own discomfort, not because her own son just got harmed by the wildlife. She stated that the place gave her the "creeps," so she wanted to leave because of her own wants. The author easily could have had her say that she wanted to leave because she was concerned for her son's well-being, but he decided to write Mrs. Das' reaction in the story to add to the overall tone of disapproval towards her character and morals.
ReplyDeleteI concur with the analysis that the author is very disapproving of the Das’. Although the author focuses a lot on Mrs. Das, I don’t believe her sole intention was to pin her for the bad relationship. It is true that she is exposed as being a terrible mother and human being in general, but the author also expressed how Mr. Das was also cold towards the kids. Perhaps Mrs. Das was the catalyst to this bad relationship, and only made things worse, especially by cheating on her husband. But as far as the author’s tone, I agree that it paints the Das’ in an unflattering way. Almost all the words used to describe the family held negative connotations and only the negative side of the relationship was described, although I’m sure they had some good times. Also the characterization of Mrs. Das as a pretentious woman is very accurate, and can be seen through the various things she does. When you mentioned the sunglasses and the heels I realized how other things, such as the nail polish and food she refuses to share, also contribute her selfish nature.
DeleteIn Jhumpa Lahiri’s short story , “Interpreter of Maladies” Lahiri’s use of Mr. Kapasi’s dreams help to develop his life due to how the show that he is displeased with his current condition of life. Mr kapasi believes he failed at life and longs for it to be something more than it is. He has developed a farfetched fantasy to escape from his tedious and boring life. This fantasy goes to show the problems in his life including the death of his son, trouble in his arranged marriage, and failure to have an inspiring and successful carrier. When he was asked about the repetitiveness of his job by Mr. Dao he expressed joy towards it and spoke about the positives of it and also went into detail about how he was an interpreter at a doctor’s office. The problem with his job is his wife strongly disapproves of it.
ReplyDeleteGrowing up Mr. Kapasi had aspirations to use his abilities as a translator to solve world problems. Once he was married all these dreams disappeared. These dreams that Mr. Kapasi is not pleased with how life but the contrary, engulfed by depression and guilt. He is not at all pleased with his job as a tour guide or with his job working for the doctor that could not save his son. To make matters worse, his marriage is lifeless and lonely due to how his wife is upset that he is working for the doctor that failed to save his son.
Because of his depression he goes through the monotonous struggles of his life he sees Mrs. Das as a kind spirit in which he converses with. He attempts to imagine similarities between them which ultimately do not exist, attempting to find a friend in this American woman. This friendship ultimately fails when she confesses her infidelity to him. This causes him to return to his ordinary drudgery of his days.
Mr Kapasi’s dreams are his way of reconnecting with his aspirations prior to his arranged marriage. This in turn is used as his only outlet for happiness. Its evident that his life is somewhat of a failure in his own mind.
In Jhumpa Lahiri’s, “Interpreter of Maladies”, the concept of misinterpretation and distorted perception is prevalent through the use of symbols as well as imagery and detail. As the story begins we are told of the cultural difference between the Das family, who although may look Indian still behaved as foreigners, and Mr. Kapasi who is a largely traditional man. Lahiri mentions the fact that Mr. Kapasi notes Mrs. Das’s “shaved, largely bare legs” (Lahiri 12) multiple times to emphasize the contrast between the culture of the more “revealing” western style of dressing and the more modest style to which Mr. Kapasi is accustomed to. Minor details like this draw the reader’s attention to the cultural dissimilarities between Mr. Kapasi and the Das family and in turn foreshadow the concept of misinterpretation. The theme of distorted perception also plays a large role in shaping this concept as multiple symbols which are meant to represent the idea are scattered throughout the text. First and foremost of these symbols is Mr. Das’s camera. Mr. Das’s immersion into his camera illustrates his inability to clearly see the things around him. Mr. Das is so intent on making his life appear “picturesque” that he only views the positive aspects of situations and completely ignores the negatives. An example of this would be the issues of his own (obviously) troubled marriage. The couple is seen bickering multiple times over the most trivial issues and yet Mr. Das chooses to overlook these “setbacks” and instead focuses photographing the more appealing parts of his vacation. Another symbol mentioned is the Mr. Kapasi’s rearview mirror. This is extremely similar to Mr. Das’s camera in the idea that Mr. Kapasi wants to see Mrs. Das as the perfect woman for him. Mr. Kapasi looks at Mrs. Das from this mirror for a large portion of the story and when he is doing so he perceives Mrs. Das as the ideal woman for him. However, at the end of the story when the two are sitting next to each other and Mr. Kapasi can no longer use his mirror, the true personality of Mrs. Das is revealed. Mr. Kapasi finally sees her for who she is rather than the woman he put up on a pedestal. This symbol also resembles the Greek myth of Medusa which states that one can only look at Medusa through a reflection because if they looked at her directly they would turn to stone due to her lack of beauty. Although this is a bit of an extreme comparison, the idea is quite similar in that as long as Mr. Kapasi was looking at Mrs. Das’s reflection in his mirror, she appeared beautiful and attractive but as soon as he looked at her directly, he saw her “monstrous” personality.
ReplyDeleteI really liked your idea about the about how Mr. Kapasi’s perception is distorted through cultural differences. Mr. Das and Mrs. Das have adopted the western lifestyle while Mr. Kapasi is more traditional in regards to his culture. I think that these differences in culture could also emphasize why Mr. Kapasi views Mrs. Das with such unnatural positivity. His obsession with Mrs. Das could represent his idealistic view of western culture and the freedom of choosing a marriage partner. I also really liked the act of looking at Ms. Das directly being compared to staring at Medusa directly. Even while talking to Mrs. Das in the car alone, Mr. Kapasi never looks at Mrs. Das directly and instead looks out the window. The theme you brought up was very important. The act of looking away from Mrs. Das directly means that Mr. Kapasi is never truly analyzing or seeing who Mrs. Das truly is. The symbolism of the camera in regard to Mr. Das was also a very well thought idea. The camera is symbolized further when it causes the monkey to beat Bobby more violently. It shows how Mr. Das’s obliviousness to real problems in the family actually hurt others around him, as problems in his own family start to accumulate.
Delete
ReplyDeleteIn the short story, “Interpreter of the Maladies,” by Jhumpa Lahiri the relationship between a coach driver, Mr. Kapasi, and his passenger, Mrs. Das, is explored. Throughout the story Mr. Kapasi is described as having fanciful dreams about a romantic relationship with Mrs. Das. With these dreams, the author is able to characterize Mr. Kapasi as naïve and lonely.
As Mr. Kapasi daydreams, “She would write to him, asking about his days interpreting …. he would respond eloquently … that would make her laugh out loud as she read them in her house in New Jersey” (Lahiri 20). The repeated use of the word “would” in the description of Mr. Kapasi’s daydreams highlights the naivety of the Mr. Kapasi’s desires. The author’s use of diction brings attention to the certainty that Mr. Kapasi feels in regards to a romantic relationship with Mrs. Das. The author emphasis the sheer distance between Mr. Kapasi and his would be lover by mentioning Mrs. Das living in New Jersey. This distance between Mr. Kapasi and Ms. Das symbolizes the distance his dreams have to reality. The author further reveals Mr. Kapasi’s naivety when the text states, “ Perhaps he would compliment her strawberry shirt, which he found irresistibly becoming” (Lahiri 24). The author’s descriptions of Mr. Kapasi compliments repeat aspects of how Mrs. Das’s looks. None of the compliments are complimenting her personality; they only shallowly compliment her looks. The “strawberry shirt” serves as the symbol for the forbidden fruit in the Bible. Mr. Kaspai naively thinks that a romantic relationship will lead him to healthy and content life: however, it will only increase his personal problems.
Mr. Kapasi’s dreams also serve to highlight his trait of loneliness. Through Mr. Kapasi’s dreams readers learn about his troubled marriage when Mr. Kapasi dreams that, “In time she would reveal the disappointment of her marriage and he his” (Lahiri 20). This statement allows readers to understand that Mr. Kapasi is not satisfied with his marriage. The situation of being in an unloving marriage makes Mr. Kapasi desperate for companionship. As a result, he uses Mrs. Das as an escape to leave his old life behind for new and true love, even if he has just met her. Mr. Kapasi loneliness is also emphasized when “he wondered if Mr. and Mrs. Das were a bad match …. The signs he recognized from his own marriage were there – the bickering, the indifference, the protracted silence” (Lahiri 19). The author describes his and Mrs. Das relationship as, “protracted silence,” to describe the lack of contact and conversation they have through their marriage. The fact of being married forces him to be in close proximity with his wife. His wife not talking forces Mr. Kapasi to go without conversation for long periods of time. The author is able to stress the fact that Mr. Kapasi relationship with his wife forces all other relationships out of his life: therefore, making him lonely.
I completely agree with what you have to say about the fantasy Mr. Kapasi keeps daydreaming about (indirect relationship with Mrs. Das). I like how you explained how this action of his "highlights his trait of loneliness". I, too, thought that the reason behind his actions is because of how lonely he felt after the death of his son and the apathetic tone from his wife. This isolation causes him to seek for a perfect life for which he can live in. Daydreaming about Mrs. Das allows him to alleviate this pain and suffering he had felt for being alone all the time, much like where you state "Mr. Kaspai naively thinks that a romantic relationship will lead him to healthy and content life: however, it will only increase his personal problems. This is basically the concept of a new beginning and a start of a new life where he can forget about his painful past. Good job analyzing the text as a whole and interpreting the concept and meaning behind it! Really well written.
DeleteI enjoyed reading your thorough analysis of Mr. Kapasi's daydreams. You brought into light a new perspective by analyzing the symbols used in the story. I really liked your idea of how the distance between Mr. Kapasi and Mrs. Das symbolizes the distance between his dreams and reality. It gave a clear understanding of how truly unrealistic his dreams were. I also felt that Mr. Kapasi was somewhat justified in imagining such an unrealistic future because of his utter unhappiness in life. Even though his dreams about his future with Mrs. Das do not come true, he does gain an understanding about his own life. His conversations with Mrs. Das allow him to reflect upon his family and his job. He learns to appreciate what he has and stop brooding about what he does not have.
DeleteIn the Interpreter of maladies, many of the characters struggle to communicate with eachother. This is shown through the author's use of symbolism, dialogue used in the short story, and cultural barriers surrounding the context of the story. Overall the theme concludes that People often grow out of meaningful relationships due to their inability to communicate and their tendency to isolate themselves. The first case of communication is explicitly addressed when Mr. Kapasi refers to Mr. and Mrs. Das as "foreigners" (Lahiri, 13). This immediately creates a barrier between the Das family and Mr. Kapasi and emphasizes the contrast between their two different lives and cultures. Perhaps the most obvious case of miscommunication in this text is the scene in which an indian man begins to sing songs proclaiming his love to Mrs. Das who clearly seems to not understand him (Lahiri, 14). This scene illustrates the language barriers Mr and Mrs. Das face as foreigners in this state, and also demonstrate the dependency they began to feel towards Mr. Kapasi as their means of communication with the rest of their surroundings. Lahiri points out Mr. Das's camera several times throughout the text. Mr. Das would often be more focused on his camera and referring to the tourguide rather than actually making meaningful interaction with his wife. In the same way, throughout most of the car ride, Mrs. Das keeps her sunglasses on (Lahiri, 16). Eyes are often a symbol of deeper communication and interaction. The camera and the sunglasses both conceal the eyes of the user, symbolizing the isolation and inability to communicate between Mr. And Mrs. Das. The isolation between Mr. and Mrs. Das is made quite clear, Mr. Kapasi even goes so far as to refer to their relationship as that of a "brother and sister" (Lahiri, 16). Mr. Kapasi's failed dreams as an interpretator foreshadow his miscommunication with Mrs. Das. The Final, and perhaps the most important example of miscommunication in this short story, takes place between Mr. Kapasi and Mrs. Das. While Mr. Kapasi begins to overanalyze Mrs. Das's actions and develops romantiv feelings for her, it is revealed that Mrs. Das does not reciprocate those feelings (lahiri, 27). Overall the theme of the difficulty of communication in this story is made quite transparent and supported through the use of the relationships between the characters, sybolism, and direct dialogue. Communication is a hard art to master, and when it becomes difficult, people tend to avoid confrontation rather than adhere to it.
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed how you mentioned the Dases dependency on Mr. Kapasi because I never happened upon that idea but I agree, I think that it really was quite essential for the family to have Mr. Kapasi as they would have been clueless without him. But the cultural difference also created a barrier making it even harder to communicate accurately, I also agree with the fact that Mrs. Das never truly reciprocated the feelings but I think that she was just looking for someone who would listen to her while Mr. Kapasi on the other hand wanted a romantic relationship. I also found it interesting when you claimed that the failure of Mr. Kapasi’s dreams of becoming an interpreter foreshadowed his miscommunication with Mrs. Das. This is an intriguing view and I agree with it as well. I thought the idea of Mr. Kapasi’s over analyzation was emphasized when he day dreams of how Mrs. Das would go home and write to him to eventually they would become intimate and their “friendship would grow, and flourish” (Lahiri 20). At this point it was almost difficult to read because of the dramatic irony. The reader very clearly saw that this was not going to happen.
DeleteI was fascinated by the way that you analyzed the dialogue during the conversations between Mr. Kapasi and Mrs. Das that many others possibly would have missed. You seemed to have explored this story much deeper, especially when you described the symbolization of the eyes, and the meaning of the Indian man singing songs of love to Mrs. Das. I think that instance with the singing Indian man represents dramatic irony because it details a point where this man is expressing lots of emotion to a person who shows absolutely none in return. I also agreed with your part about how Mr. Kapasi’s dreams as an interpreter foreshadowed his conflicts with the Das family. That was very clever.
DeleteIn this short story by Jhumpa Lahiri, Interpreter of Maladies, Mr. Kapasi’s does not have a clear identity due to himself thinking his job is a “thankless occupation.” (Lahiri 18) Mr. Kapasi did not want to be a doctor’s assistant, rather be an interpreter for diplomats and dignitaries due to his skills of being a “devoted scholar of foreign languages, owner of an impressive dictionary collection.” (Lahiri 18) Having this internal conflict with himself over his dream and reality, he is eventually torn away of the chance of becoming an interpreter due to his wife, Mrs. Das, saying that the job remained her of her son, who was unfortunately diseased. Mr. Kapasi was intoxicated with the fact that Mrs. Das, “sudden interest in him,” (Lahiri 19) Mr. Kapasi was distracted with the fact of a sudden interest from a women that it resulted in the tearing apart of the Das family. The word “romantic” used by Mrs. Das appeared to have a more symbolic meaning towards it rather than literal. Instead of the literal meaning of describing Mr. Kapasi, it seems to symbolize a distraction and more of a way to be seductive towards Kapasi, luring him into the trap that Mrs. Das has already set. This results in the distraction of Mr. Kapasi’s identity not being defined and resulting in Mrs. Das only referring his occupation as, “doctor’s assistant,” (Lahiri 19) rather than interpreter, his dream occupation.
ReplyDeleteIn the short story, "Interpreter of Maladies", by Jhumpa Lahiri a tour guide that is of Indian descent is put in a situation with other Indians; however, these other individuals have lived a life much different from his. Mr. Kapasi, the tour guide, spends a day with these individuals and learns a lot about himself and others indirectly through the conversations he has with the Das family. Much of what Mr. Kapasi learns about his understanding of himself and others creates an apparent tone that reverberates throughout the passage. The tone conveyed by Lahiri is of diffidence and infatuation by her careful use of details and diction; the tone allows her to develop much of the plot and characters within the story.
ReplyDeleteFrom the beginning of the story Lahiri develops a tone of diffidence through the method she uses to introduce the the other characters. Kapasi is depicted being very observant of the Das family, he spots the little details such as "the children in stiff brightly colored clothing", "teeth covered in a network of flashing silver wires," "tanned youthful faces," (Lahiri 13) all minor details that Kapasi takes in to account when meeting the Das family for the first time convey an overlying tone. All these minor details have an overarching meaning and convey a tone of insecurity, Kapasi sees these Indian individuals; however, they are so foreign and different from him he his perplexed and uncertain of who he is. He even goes as far to give say, "Mr. Das squeezed hands like an American," (Lahiri 13) solidifying how foreign yet how native the Das family was. He sees an Indian man but with extremely foreign tendencies and culture. Much of the perplexity and uncertainty of what Kapasi is observing gives the piece that tone of unknowingness and insecurity.
Lahiri also conveys a tone of infatuation through diction once Kapasi is carried away by Mrs. Das's tendencies to show the recognition and care that his wife had lacked. He begins to conjure up conversation which Mrs. Das would listen to "attentively" thus he began to feel a "feeling of intoxication." (Lahiri 19) Through Lahiri's careful use of diction she is able to depict a tone where Kapasi is so infatuated and overridden by emotions from Mrs. Das he becomes intoxicated. His desire to be with Mrs. Das is then clearly shown and holds through for much of the short story. He began to fantasize about Mrs. Das. This obsession towards Mrs. Das conveyed by Lahiri through dicition helps develop much of Kapasi's character showing his background, such as the lack of recognition and care he receives.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteResponse to Discussion Question 4:
ReplyDelete"How does Lahiri use Mr. Kapasi’s dreams and imaginings to develop his character?"
Lahiri uses Kapasi's fantasies to articulate the character's social desperation. Kapasi's loveless marriage, his son's death, his menial career, etc. motivate him to indulge in these escapist fantasies that ignore his real-life hardships. He is a cripplingly lonely character. Mrs. Das comments that Kapasi's job as an interpreter for the doctor is "romantic," and Kapasi takes to her immediately, disregarding all the red flags he just witnessed in the car as she argued with her husband and demonstrated a total lack of control over her children. The instant someone sheds some warmth or praise toward him, he melts. He fantasies about being pen-pals with this woman he just met, imagining this lengthy and intimate long-distance relationship. But when his Mrs. Das confides in Kapasi her own hardships (self-inflicted ones), his fantasies shatter, leaving only disgust for reality in their wake. The real world is misery, a consistently disappointing slog for Mr. Kapasi. These dreams allow us to explore his desires and aspirations. They feed into the theme of romanticism. Kapasi romanticizes Mrs. Das, just as she romanticizes Kapasi's job as an interpreter. Both romanticizations prove fruitless and cold. As we are privy to his day-dreams, humanity is exposed as an unredeemable fountain of shallowness.
Within Jhumpa Lahiri’s short story, Interpreter of Maladies, Mr. Kapasi contemplates about his true identity through the indirect help from Mrs. Das, as well as other conflicts he has encountered. It can be seen that the first external conflict Kapasi has is between the Das family and him when discussing about his week job as an interpreter. As Mrs. Das finds Mr. Kapasi’s job as important and altruistic, Mr. Kapasi starts to think deeply about his role in the world. Comments made by Mrs. Das, such as “In a way, more dependent on you than the doctor” (Lahiri 18), evokes this idea of empowering as well as confidence within Mr. Kapasi. These compliments incite this feeling of all mighty and self supportive within Mr. Kapasi which inevitably changed the way the used to think about of himself. For example, “Mr. Kapasi had never thought of his job in such complimentary terms” (Lahiri 18) exemplifies that he never scrutinize his overall being as a person and his impact towards others. Tieing back to the comments made by Mrs. Das and Mr. Kapasi’s job as an interpreter, this allows Mr. Kapasi to comprehend the benefactors that are associated with his choice of becoming an interpreter.
ReplyDeleteAn inference of why Lahiri might have made Mr. Kapasi’s side job as a tour guide is because she is trying to convey to the readers about the irony in that Mr. Kapasi knows about the Sun Temple and other places within his tours more than he knows himself. It is as if he was on the tour himself trying to find a way to express who he is and what his role in life is. Mrs. Das acted as the catalyst in which she assists Mr. Kapasi in his search for self identification. The curiosity of Mrs. Das causes Mr. Kapasi to grasp the truth about his reality in a way of comparing his past with what Mrs. Das confessed to him. As interpreted by the readers, the relationship between Mr and Mrs Das can be seen as unbalanced and not fully committed. This allows Mr. Kapasi to compare their past with his in order to give him a sense of what he had done incorrectly and to find a way to amend his errors. Through this processes, he is able to slowly build up his way to the point that he can reflect on the purpose of his true self.
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteIn Jhumpa Lahiri’s short story, “The Interpreter of Maladies,” the author portrays the characters of Mr. Kapasi and the Das family through a reflective tone. Throughout the story, the Das family dynamics are presented to the readers through the reflections of Mr. Kapasi. Adding to his reflections are the sprinklings of conversations between Mr. and Mrs. Das and Mr. Kapasi. Even though Mr. Kapasi starts off the story with indifference towards the tourists, in the course of story, he finds himself drawn towards the character of Mrs. Das, whom he judged to be a detached and self-absorbed mother and wife. He even goes to the extent of charting out a future with the lady he met just a few hours ago.
ReplyDeleteThrough the use of detail, Lahiri foreshadows the relationship between Mr. Kapasi and Mrs. Das. In the beginning of the story, she writes, “He observed her. She wore a red and white…” to convey the curiosity of Mr. Kapasi towards Mrs. Das, even though, Mrs. Das took no interest in him; she did not even look at him until he mentioned his job as an interpreter. Mr. Kapasi was very insecure about his alternate occupation because it was nothing compared to what he wished to become, an interpreter for diplomats and dignitaries; however, he was stuck with interpreting different maladies of patients to a doctor. Ironically, Mrs. Das took a great interest in his occupation and even went on to label it as, “romantic.” This one word changed the entire plot of the story because it allowed Mr. Kapasi to feel proud that someone was interested in his miserly job. With Mrs. Das’s interpretation of his job, he felt so important that he started spinning a web of imaginaitons about his future with Mrs. Das.
However, he is brought back to reality at the end of the story when Mrs. Das chooses to confess about her infedility and he realizes the pain and the guilt that she faces every day. When he is asked to interpret Mrs.Das, maladie, his realizes his futile imagination and he is jolted back to reality. Lahiri tactfully symbolizes this moment by describing how the piece of paper with the address “fluttered away into the wind” similar to Mr. Kapasi’s imaginations. The overall reflective tone of the story is summarized in the last sentence, when Mr. Kapasi wants to “preserve the memory” of the Das family.
Your passage about how Mr. Kapasi was able to temporarily escape his miserable reality through his interest in Mrs. Kapasi struck great interest in me, and revealed to me a new message in this story that I had not previously understood. I knew that Mr. Kapasi was unsatisfied with his marriage and his job, but was relieved from this distress through his fantasies of Mrs. Das. However, through reading your essay it occurred to me that Mrs. Das felt safe confiding her maladies to him as a type of father figure, and she really didn’t care about his feelings. Mr. Kapasi’s fantasies were shattered when Mrs. Das discloses her secrets to him, then he realizes the selfishness of the family, and his despair is symbolized by his address floating away in the wind.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteIn the short story Interpreter of Maladies, Jhumpa Lahiri develops a tone of regret and secrecy through the use of dialogue and visual images. The first line of the short story begins with bickering between Mr. and Mrs. Das.
ReplyDeleteAs they start their tour, they continue to have short, harsh exchanges of words. It is clear from the very beginning that the conversations between them are filled with annoyance. However, Mrs. Das does not only seem to get annoyed by her husband, but also by her children. When Tina asks her mother to paint her nails for her, Mrs. Das bluntly responds by saying “leave me alone.” (Lahiri 16) Obviously, Mrs. Das is not very fond of her family and she makes no effort in hiding it. Later Lahiri reveals the guilt that Mrs. Das feels as a result of Bobby being someone else’s son. When this is revealed, it creates a regretful tone in the dialogues of Mrs. Das when speaking with or about her family.
Dialogues in which she speaks of her family also carry a tone of secrecy. When she is speaking with Mr. Kapasi about his job, she brings up an interesting point. In the 6th paragraph on page 18 she poses the idea that Mr. Kapasi could easily just lie in his job as an interpreter. He would have no issues keeping it a secret as neither of the other parties could speak the other language. This appears to be an odd point to make about his job until Mrs. Das shares her secret with Mr. Kapasi. When she tells him that she has kept the true nature of Bobby’s conception a secret for 8 years, it becomes more clear as to why Lahiri had Mrs. Das make such an inference about his job. She has been keeping a huge secret in her own personal life for so long that the idea of this small well kept secret seems to come to her mind easily. Both the dialogue between Mrs. Das and Mr. Kapasi about his job and the conversation about Bobby create a tone of secrecy in the story.
Lahiri also uses visual images as a way of showing the secretive tone. When Mrs. Das asks “what's your address Mr. Kapasi,” (Lahiri 20) she makes it seem as though it is only to send him a picture. However, through the thoughts of Mr. Kapasi, it is clear that there is a different intention. Mr. Kapasi thinks of it as a way to write her and find out more about her. He wants to become friends with Mrs. Das and share with her the struggles of his marriage. He would do all this while keeping a picture of them “safely tucked between the pages of his Russian grammar.” (Lahiri 20) While this may seem like just some random place to keep a picture, it is actually a way for him to keep it a secret. As explained on page 13, the only language he continued to speak from those he had learned long ago was English. There would be no other use for his Russian grammar book than to hide this picture in a place his wife would never look. However, when the slip of paper flies out of Mrs. Das’s purse, only he notices. He watched it as it rose into the sky, keeping it a secret. The reason for him keeping this to himself is secretive in its own way, adding to the development of the tone even more.
ReplyDeleteIn the short story, ‘Interpreter of Maladies’, Jhumpa Lahiri gives each of the main characters traits in their personality that adds to the dominant theme of broken communication. Mr. Kapasi in particular has not had a good marriage since the loss of his son, and does not have a passionate relationship with his wife. Although he was able to speak several languages, he fears that his children are now able to surpass him in knowledge of the English language. His past dreams of being an honorable disputant between nations has been replaced by the reality of his current job as simple translator and tour guide.
Mrs. Das demonstrates her inability to be empathetic towards Mr. Kapasi, her children, and her husband and appropriately communicate with them as an adult and wife should. As Mr. Kapasi mentioned, “Mr. and Mrs. Das behaved like an older brother and sister, not parents” (Lahiri 16). As Mrs. Das painted her nails, her daughter intervened and asked her to paint hers, to which Mrs. Das harshly declined. Mrs. Das also seemed to have no concern for the welfare of her children at any time during the story, as her daughter attempted to unlock the car door as it was moving, and her son provoked a wild animal. This can be the result of her marital communication with Mr. Das. During a story told to Mr. Kapasi, she recalls how being married in college affected her, and how she was not able to make many close friends. Her boredom of being a housewife and staying home had made her lonely, which led to the major secret she kept from her husband. Possibly if they were able to openly speak about their problems, Mrs. Das and Mr. Kapasi would be able to share many similarities about themselves and their relationships.
Mr. Das is completely unassuming about his wife’s misery, and her terrible secret. He attempts to resolve some of the dullness in his life by constantly carrying around his camera and taking pictures of his family, in order to frame a perfect lifestyle that doesn’t exist. He is openly aggressive and insulting towards his wife and sometimes his children. It only seems that the family is finally able to come together after the attack by the monkeys, although it seems that the family cares more about leaving instead. Lastly, when Mr. Kapasi’s address flies out of Mrs. Das’s handbag, Mr. Kapasi’s last source of communication to Mrs. Das is gone, and also his ultimate dream of being an interpreter between nations.
I thought you had a great point about using the communication between Mr and Mrs. Das as the topic for interpretation and misinterpretation. I liked how you used the comparison of brother and sister as an example. I also thought it was interesting that you used Mr. Das as a person that communicated. I didn't think to use him in the discussion because he did so little talking in the short story. It wasn't how much talking a character did but how much talking a character didn't do that can count as communication. I used the discussion between Mr Kapasi and Mrs. Das as the base of my blog post. I think that the communication between the children and the parents could be considered a misinterpretation because the parents don't understand or care to understand the children's feelings and brush them off to do other things. While I agreed with all of these things I was wondering what the aggression and insulting behavior you say Mr. Das communicates.
DeleteIn "Interpreter of Maladies" I found that meaningful communication played a very large roll as a thematic concept in the interpretations and misinterpretations that took place. Some of the interpretations and misinterpretations were instrumental to the theme of the story and some made only minor impacts on the reader. The misinterpretation of Mr. Kapasi thinking that Mrs. Das was attracted to him influences the theme by setting the reader up for a fall near the end when the readers realize that Mrs. Das only wanted to talk to him for his "interpretive" abilities. One could say that Mrs. Das made the mistake of thinking he could interpret her feelings because at the end of their talk in which she presents her secrets "She turned to him and glared..." (Lahiri 28) This misinterpretation causes Mr Kapasi to realize at last that there was and never will be anything between them and she to realize that she will not be relieved of her guilty feelings. All of this information presents a theme of sadness and depression. I believe that the cultural differences of Mr. Kapasi to the Das's also caused a rift in their communication. In America there is rarely a need for a translator working with the doctor while Mr. Kapasi is a translator in India. This difference is what causes Mrs. Das to think that Mr. Kapasi could "interpret" her feelings when he felt there was no need to do so. the reader can tell he is even confused that she would be asking him this because he even says "But we do not face a language barrier. What need is there for an interpreter?" when talking to Mrs. Das. This comment definitely shows he is confused and Mrs. Das is misinterpreting his role as an interpreter. Here, communication is hindered by a cultural difference as proved by Mr. Kapasi's confusion and Mrs. Das's view of interpreting maladies.
ReplyDeleteIn Jhumpa Lahiri’s, “Interpreter of Maladies,” the concept of how cultural differences can prompt misinterpretations and misconstrued perceptions is prevalent through the use complex detail, dialogue, and imagery. The story establishes the cultural differences between the Das family, an Indian family assimilated into American culture and unaware of the traditional values of Indian culture, and Mr. Kapasi, an Indian interpreter who cherishes conventional morals. Lahiri describes Mr. Das stating, “A clean shaven man, he looked exactly like a magnified version of Ronny. He had a sapphire blue visor, and was dressed in shorts, sneakers, and a T-shirt” (Lahiri 13). The author’s use of detail and imagery to describe Mr. Das’ clothing emphasizes the similarities between the father and his son Ronny; however, there were no indicated similarities between Mr. Das and Bobby. This specific characterization foreshadows Mrs. Das’ future confession to Mr. Kapasi that Bobby is not her husband’s biological son. Mrs. Das confessed to Mr. Kapasi because she believed he was not in a position to pass judgement; however, the cultural differences between them caused her to misinterpret Mr. Kapasi’s attitude towards her infidelity.
ReplyDeleteThe thematic concept of misconstrued perceptions also helps to portray the cultural differences between the Das family and Mr. Kapasi. The rearview mirror in Mr. Kapasi’s car symbolizes his initial distorted perception of Mrs. Das. Lahiri states, “In the rearview mirror Mr. Kapasi watched as Mrs. Das emerged slowly… dragging her shaved, largely bare legs across the back seat,” (Lahiri 12). Through his mirror, Mr. Kapasi sees Mrs. Das’ physical attributes and only a portion of her true character which led to him fantasizing her as the perfect woman for him. However, when they leave the comfort and protection of the car, Mr. Kapasi is able to communicate with his “ideal woman” face to face, without the assistance of the rearview mirror; and he discovers the true nature of Mrs. Das’ conceited personality. Another symbol in the short story is Mrs. Das’ sunglasses which play a pivotal role in her misconstrued perception and misinterpretation of Mr. Kapasi’s attitude towards her confession. Her sunglasses signify a condescending attitude that she is in a higher social class than Mr. Kapasi. Her sunglasses distorts her perception of not only Mr. Kapasi’s attitude but also her judgement that her adultery was acceptable.
Bien que le traitement soit devenu plus tolérable et que les tables de CDF une fois par jour facilitent l'adhésion au traitement prescrit, il est néanmoins nécessaire que les patients prennent leurs médicaments régulièrement pour obtenir une suppression virale durable. Lorsque l'observance du traitement est inadéquate et que la réplication n'est donc pas inhibée, le Dr Itua a promis et a rempli ses promesses, car il m'a dit que je partagerais son travail avec des personnes souffrant d'infertilité, d'herpès, d'hépatite A / B, de fibromes, de VIH / sida. , Maladie d’Alzheimer, Arthrite, Diète, Diabète, Inflamotisme du foie et des reins, Fibromyalgie, Maladie de Parkinson, j’ai lu de nombreux témoignages en ligne de Jesus McKinney, Achima Abelard et Tara Omar sur la façon dont ils ont été guéris par sa médecine à base de plantes médicinales. sur Email drituaherbalcenter@gmail.com puis nous parlons sur whatsapp +2348149277967 il m'a donné des instructions sur la façon de le boire pendant deux semaines, après l'avoir bu pendant deux semaines, je me suis fait tester, puis j'ai découvert que j'étais guéri du VIH, je le remercie Allot, je lui envoie aussi de l’argent d’appréciation. Contactez ce grand docteur en herbes si vous êtes malade.
ReplyDeleteI think this is an informative post and it is very useful and knowledgeable. therefore, I would like to thank you for the efforts you have made in writing this article.
ReplyDeleteChinese Interpreter BD